Photo: 123RF
Reactions to the government's NCEA reset vary from welcoming the abolition of a confusing system, to fear that poorer communities will be left behind.
It is billed as the most significant overhaul of NCEA in more than two decades, but there are questions being raised in the education industry about whether it is a bold step forward or a risky roll of the dice.
The government's sweeping changes to the national qualification aim to lift standards, streamline the way students are assessed, and restore confidence.
RNZ education correspondent John Gerritsen tells The Detail the bold move comes with both hope and hesitation.
"There is a sort of sense that maybe this new system is trying to apply a way of working that might suit the kids in the leafy suburbs and not so much the kids in the poorer areas," he says.
The changes should be in place by 2030.
If you never understood NCEA, or you are unsure of what the changes involve, this is the podcast to listen to as Gerritsen takes us through what's going on.
NCEA Level 1 - which typically takes place in Year 11 - will be abolished, with students being required to take English and mathematics and to sit a new 'Foundational Skills Award' test that documents achievement in literacy and numeracy.
Two new qualifications will replace NCEA Level 2 and Level 3, for Year 12 and 13 students respectively.
They will now qualify with the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE), respectively.
Students will be required to take five subjects, and will have to pass at least four, to attain each certificate in Years 12 and 13.
A to E pass-fail grades will replace the "excellent, merit, achieved, and not achieved" rankings.
Supporters of the changes say this is exactly what NCEA needs. Employers have long voiced concerns that school leavers do not always have the basic skills needed for the workforce. With literacy and numeracy now the focus, that gap could start to close.
And by reducing assessment overload, that means less pressure on students and more time for actual learning.
Some parents also claim it should be easier for them to understand what their child is learning - and why.
"On one level, you'd have to say, a qualification system that has been in place since 2002, so over 20 years, and still confuses people probably needs to be revised pretty heavily," says Gerritsen.
"Some of the way the language, the way this has been described - it's been a bit obtuse, and people have struggled to understand it over the years."
But for every person applauding the changes, another is sounding the alarm.
Some principals and parents worry that standalone literacy and numeracy tests risk leaving behind students with learning differences or who are from non-English-speaking backgrounds.
"There is a whole swathe of young people who struggle with exams," Gerritsen tells The Detail.
"Some of them may have dyslexia, others may just simply have anxiety about doing exams.
"There are also issues around increasing shifts to computer-based exams for students who don't have much to do with computers, so this is definitely going to become an issue."
And then there is the equity question. Will all schools - urban, rural, well-resourced, or underfunded - be ready to deliver under this new scheme? Or will the gaps further widen?
"When talking to principals from poorer communities, they're really worried that a system that has helped their communities achieve success is going to be got rid of and replaced with something with big question marks around it," Gerritsen says.
"There are worries that young people from poorer backgrounds are going to be disadvantaged by this, and they will be less likely to leave school with some sort of qualification."
The consultation process closes in less than five weeks.
And when it comes to the future of every New Zealand student, there is no room for error.
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook
